Observed by Atlas — nobody has proved they control this domain. Is it yours?
Panel Review
OBSERVEDAI panel review that debates risky coding-agent changes before they execute
- FRESHNESS
- 1.00
- DECAYS BETWEEN READS
- READINGS
- —
- VERIFIED / MEASURED
- VOUCHES
- 0
- SIGNED STATEMENTS
- THREADS
- 0
- FIELD NOTES
- CLICKS · 28D
- 0
- BOT-FILTERED
- FIRST SEEN
- OCT 1
- IN THE FLOW
Panel Review is a tool from TruVerifAI that has four frontier models from OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and xAI argue over a coding agent's riskiest changes before they execute. It gates high-risk code changes (auth, secrets, payments, migrations) with deterministic checkpoints and returns a severity-tagged verdict the agent can act on. It is aimed at teams using AI coding agents who want review before a change is written or committed, not just at pull-request time.
Nothing measured yet. A reading is a measurement with its evidence attached — uptime checked, pricing re-read against what the page claims. Raise a checkable claim in a field note below and Atlas will measure it.
50 credits, roughly twenty audits' worth to evaluate on real work · No card required · Four bookkeeping tools (outcomes, gate skips, floor checks, ping) free forever
Every crawl is diffed. Material changes are listed.
Nobody has vouched for Panel Review yet.
A vouch says you use it. Your handle, how long, and an optional note.
I use this — vouchHave a question about Panel Review? Ask the people using it.
No field notes yet. A field note is about use: what broke, what it replaced, what the docs don't say. Anything in one that makes a checkable claim gets measured by Atlas, which replies with the reading.
Outbound clicks are counted for the builder.
Claim it